When it comes to version control systems, SVN (Subversion) and Git are two popular options that you may have considered using.

Both tools are designed to help teams manage changes to code, collaborate effectively, and maintain a history of their projects. However, there are also key differences between the two in how they operate, and each suits various needs.

SVN is a centralised version control system, while Git is decentralised, giving each user a full repository copy. This major difference impacts how teams work and handle conflicts, and how they access project histories.

In this SVN vs Git comparison, we’ll break down the key differences between SVN and Git, including their unique pros and cons to help you decide which fits your project’s requirements better. If you're starting a new project or considering a switch, you need to understand the strengths and limitations of each system.

Understanding the Basics of SVN and Git

Before we dive into the differences between these two systems, it’s important to understand what SVN and Git are.

SVN, short for Subversion, is a centralised version control system. This means all files and their history are stored on a central server, where team members go to work on their projects.

Git is a distributed version control system. Instead of relying solely on a central server, every user has a complete copy of the repository, including its history. This allows you to work offline and offers more flexibility.

Ultimately, both tools are used to track changes and facilitate teamwork, but they take different approaches.

How They Manage Version Control

SVN and Git handle version control differently, which impacts how teams work.

SVN uses a centralised system, where the files and changes are stored on a main server. Developers check out files to work on them and then commit changes back to the server. This setup ensures everyone works from the same version but it depends heavily on server availability.

Git distributes a full copy of the repository to each user. This means developers can work offline, make changes locally, and later sync with the central repository. This system is quicker and more flexible to use, especially for large teams or projects that require frequent updates.

Save countless hours on your projects

Raise tasks in under 3 seconds using our revolutionary widget

Which Tool Handles Changes Better?

When it comes to handling changes, Git offers more flexibility than SVN. This is because, in SVN, conflicts are resolved directly on the central server. This can sometimes slow down workflows, especially if large teams are making simultaneous edits.

Git’s interface is different, allowing developers to work on changes locally. Users can commit changes, test them, and even undo mistakes before sharing updates with the central repository. Git is also excellent at merging changes from multiple contributors, thanks to its powerful branching and merging capabilities.

To summarise, SVN is reliable for straightforward projects, but Git's distributed nature makes it better suited for managing complicated changes and collaborating easily. When you’re choosing from SVN vs Git, make sure to consider your project’s needs.

Comparing Flexibility for Teams

Flexibility is another key difference between SVN and Git. SVN’s centralised system works well for smaller teams or projects where real-time synchronisation is essential. However, its reliance on a central server means that any downtime can interrupt workflows.

Git’s distributed system offers more flexibility, with each team member having a complete copy of the repository, allowing them to work offline, experiment with changes, and commit updates at their own pace. Git also makes it easier for teams to work on multiple features or fixes simultaneously.

For dynamic teams, Git’s decentralised approach may be a better option as it provides more freedom and efficiency.

Choosing the Right Version Control System for Your Needs

Choosing between SVN and Git depends on your project and your team's needs. If you value simplicity and real-time synchronisation and you work on smaller projects, SVN is best for you. Its centralised system is straightforward and ideal for environments where server dependency isn’t an issue.

On the other hand, Git is better suited for larger teams or complex projects. Its distributed system allows offline work and faster operations, with efficient branching and merging. Git is also widely adopted, making it easier to find support and integrate with modern tools.

To select the right tool, you’ll need to assess your workflow, team size, and project complexity.

For Better Project Collaboration, Work With QualityHive

Now you know how to choose between SVN vs Git, you might be keen to further improve your team’s ability to collaborate effectively.

QualityHive is a solution that helps simplify feedback, quality assurance (QA), and web development processes for agencies.

With our tool, you can track bugs, submit and receive feedback, and collaborate easily through features like instant screenshots, video recordings, and a Kanban board for task management.

Our platform captures detailed browser and device information, allowing your team to quickly address issues, reduce errors, and be more productive without using spreadsheets. It’s a simplified way to manage website feedback and action various tasks to keep your project on track.

To save hours of development time for each project, contact us or book a free trial today.