Figma vs XD: Who's the Winner in 2024?

QualityHive Logo

By Harry Robinson6th February 2024

QA Improvement
QualityHive Blog

Figma vs XD: Who Wins?

In the rapidly evolving world of web development, choosing the right design tool is crucial for ensuring a seamless workflow. Two of the most popular tools in the market today are Figma and Adobe XD. Both have their strengths and weaknesses, and each has its own dedicated user base. In this article, we will compare Figma and XD from a design, quality assurance (QA), and development perspective, specifically for web development agencies.

Design Perspective

User Interface and Experience

When it comes to user interface and experience, both Figma and XD offer intuitive and user-friendly environments. However, there are some key differences:

  • Figma: Figma is known for its clean and straightforward interface. Its cloud-based nature allows designers to work from anywhere, and real-time collaboration is seamless. The learning curve is gentle, making it accessible for beginners while still providing powerful features for advanced users.

  • XD: Adobe XD, being part of the Adobe Creative Cloud suite, integrates well with other Adobe products like Photoshop and Illustrator. Its interface is familiar to those who use Adobe's other tools. XD also offers robust prototyping capabilities, making it a strong contender for interactive designs.

Collaboration

Collaboration is a critical aspect of modern web design, and both tools offer robust solutions:

  • Figma: Figma's standout feature is its real-time collaboration. Multiple designers can work on the same project simultaneously, seeing each other's changes live. This feature is particularly useful for teams distributed across different locations.

  • XD: Adobe XD offers coediting, but it's not as seamless as Figma’s real-time collaboration. However, XD’s integration with Creative Cloud Libraries facilitates asset sharing and management across different Adobe tools, which can be beneficial for teams already invested in the Adobe ecosystem.

Design Systems and Libraries

Creating and managing design systems and libraries is essential for maintaining consistency across projects:

  • Figma: Figma excels in this area with its shared libraries and components. Teams can create reusable components and styles that can be updated across all instances, ensuring consistency and saving time.

  • XD: Adobe XD also offers design system management through Creative Cloud Libraries. While it is powerful, some users find it less intuitive compared to Figma’s implementation.

Prototyping

Prototyping is a crucial feature for web design, allowing designers to create interactive mockups:

  • Figma: Figma’s prototyping tools are robust and easy to use. Designers can create interactive prototypes with animations and transitions. The live preview feature is particularly useful for client presentations.

  • XD: Adobe XD shines in prototyping. Its Auto-Animate feature allows for advanced animations and micro-interactions, which can bring designs to life. The ability to create voice interactions also sets it apart.

QA Perspective

Design Hand-off

The design hand-off process is critical for ensuring that the development team accurately implements the design:

  • Figma: Figma’s hand-off process is straightforward. Developers can inspect designs directly in the browser, access CSS properties, and download assets. The real-time collaboration feature also means that developers can ask questions and get clarifications instantly.

  • XD: Adobe XD provides a similar hand-off experience. Developers can access design specs, download assets, and view CSS properties. XD’s integration with Creative Cloud Libraries ensures that assets are easily accessible.

Feedback and Iteration

Feedback and iteration are crucial for QA processes:

  • Figma: Figma’s real-time collaboration and commenting features make it easy for QA teams to provide feedback. Comments can be pinned directly to design elements, ensuring clear communication. The ability to create different versions of designs also aids in iterative testing.

  • XD: Adobe XD offers commenting features as well, but they are not as integrated as Figma’s. However, XD’s integration with other Adobe tools can facilitate more detailed feedback and iteration workflows.

Save countless hours on your projects

Raise tasks in under 3 seconds using our revolutionary widget

Quality Assurance Testing Kanban
Free trial

Development Perspective

Integration with Development Tools

Seamless integration with development tools can significantly enhance the workflow:

  • Figma: Figma integrates well with various development tools like Zeplin, Avocode, and Framer. It also offers API access, allowing for custom integrations. The direct browser-based access means developers can easily inspect designs without needing additional software.

  • XD: Adobe XD also supports integration with tools like Zeplin and Avocode. Its strong point is the integration with the Adobe ecosystem, which can streamline workflows for teams already using Adobe products extensively.

Performance and Responsiveness

Performance and responsiveness are vital for a smooth development process:

  • Figma: Figma, being cloud-based, performs exceptionally well in terms of real-time collaboration and responsiveness. However, it can be resource-intensive and may lag on less powerful machines.

  • XD: Adobe XD, being a desktop application, can leverage local resources more efficiently. This often results in better performance on high-end machines, but it lacks the seamless real-time collaboration of Figma.

Conclusion

Both Figma and Adobe XD are powerful tools with their own unique strengths and weaknesses. The choice between the two largely depends on the specific needs and workflows of your web development agency:

  • Choose Figma if: Your team values real-time collaboration, cloud-based access, and robust design system management. Figma is particularly well-suited for distributed teams and projects requiring frequent iterations and feedback.

  • Choose XD if: Your team is already invested in the Adobe ecosystem and requires advanced prototyping features. XD is ideal for agencies that need tight integration with other Adobe tools and prefer a desktop application for performance reasons.

Ultimately, both tools are capable of delivering high-quality designs and facilitating effective collaboration between designers, QA teams, and developers. It’s worth considering a trial of both to see which one aligns best with your agency’s workflow and project requirements.

By carefully evaluating your team’s needs and workflows, you can make an informed decision that will enhance productivity and streamline your web development processes. Whether you choose Figma or Adobe XD, both tools will provide you with the features and capabilities needed to create outstanding web designs.

Revolutionise your QA processes

Bug tracking tool for web designers

You'll probably like these too

Online Feedback Tool

GeneralDevelopment

Tailwind vs Bootstrap in 2024

By Harry Robinson20th August 2024

Online Feedback Tool

GeneralQA

Key Statistics on Bugs in Websites in 2024

By Harry Robinson5th August 2024

QA Improvement

GeneralDevelopment

Strapi vs. Contentful in 2024

By Harry Robinson1st August 2024

Online Feedback Tool

General

Toggl Plan vs. LiquidPlanner

By Harry Robinson17th July 2024

Online Feedback Tool

GeneralDevelopment

Tailwind vs Bootstrap in 2024

By Harry Robinson20th August 2024

Online Feedback Tool

GeneralQA

Key Statistics on Bugs in Websites in 2024

By Harry Robinson5th August 2024

QA Improvement

GeneralDevelopment

Strapi vs. Contentful in 2024

By Harry Robinson1st August 2024

Online Feedback Tool

General

Toggl Plan vs. LiquidPlanner

By Harry Robinson17th July 2024

Start looking forward
to feedback

14 day free trial

Full-fat features, free for 14-days

QA Specialists

Video support included in our minimum plan

Team Mates Included

Quick and easy set up, No card required

footer base hillsfooter base treesfooter base cloudsfooter base dashboard