Should you pick Atarim or QualityHive?
Pick Atarim if you want an AI agency that does the work on client sites, especially on WordPress. Pick QualityHive if you want a straightforward tool for collecting website feedback and seeing it through to completion yourself, on a plan priced by members and projects instead of credits.
Atarim has changed a lot. It began as a visual feedback tool and now describes itself as "an AI agency that plugs into yours and does the client work". Its WordPress plugin gives AI real access to a site to edit pages and update plugins, with changes approved before they go live. The visual feedback is still there: pin a comment to an element, share a link and let guests comment without an account. It now sits inside a much bigger product.
How the two compare on price and seats
All figures are monthly and in US dollars, taken from Atarim's pricing page and our pricing page at the time of writing (November 2026). Atarim says annual billing saves 20%.
| QualityHive | Atarim |
Free plan | 1 member, 1 project, no guest feedback | 1 project, 200 credits one time, workflows dormant |
Paid plans | Lite $18, Essential $40, Mega $78, Colossal $140 | Pro $67, Enterprise custom |
Seats | 2, 5, 10 or 30 by plan | Up to 100 on Pro |
Projects | 5 on Lite, unlimited from Essential | Up to 1,000 on Pro |
What you are buying | Feedback and task tracking | AI specialists and workflows that do client work, with feedback included |
Usage limit | Members and projects | 5,000 credits a month on Pro, top-ups from $10 per 1,000 |
Who makes site changes | Your team | Atarim's AI with your approval, or your team |
Guest feedback | One link, no login, no seat, Lite and above | No account, email required, remembered for 90 days per browser |
Install options | Script, Google Tag Manager, or a Chrome, Firefox or Edge extension | URL project, script, WordPress plugin or Chrome-based extension |
Direct integrations | Trello and Monday.com | Slack, Jira, Trello, ClickUp, Asana, Monday.com and Basecamp in its help docs |
AI tools | MCP server for your own assistant, Lite and above | Six built-in AI specialists plus an MCP |
What the credit model means in practice
Credits are how Atarim charges for AI work. Its pricing page says they pay for every AI action, such as a workflow running, a site review or a "Do it" request, and that work pauses when they run out, with top-ups available. The same page says every part of the platform is open on Pro, including visual collaboration and client feedback, and that credits are the only thing you add on top.
If your plan is to let AI do the work, credits are a sensible way to pay for it. If you want a fixed monthly cost for a feedback tool, a plan based on members and projects is simpler to budget.
Take a hypothetical example. A client flags a misaligned price on a fictional shop, example-store.test. With Atarim on WordPress you can ask its AI to make the change and approve the result. With QualityHive the client clicks the element, a task with a screenshot lands on the board, and your developer fixes it and marks it complete. The question is whether you want AI making the edit or a person.
When Atarim is the better choice
You want AI doing the work. Atarim's specialists handle jobs like plugin updates, page edits, reports and SEO, which QualityHive does not attempt.
You run WordPress sites. Its plugin brings feedback onto the site itself, reaches staging and other non-public sites, and works with builders including Elementor, Bricks and Divi.
You have a large team. Pro's single price covers up to 100 seats and 1,000 projects. QualityHive tops out at 30 members on Colossal.
You need more connections. Atarim's help docs cover Slack, Jira, ClickUp, Asana and Basecamp as well as Trello and Monday.com, and its plugin listing adds Zapier, Make and webhooks. QualityHive's direct integrations are Trello and Monday.com only.
You also review designs. Atarim covers images and has a Figma plugin. QualityHive works on websites only.
Where QualityHive fits better
QualityHive suits teams that want feedback to stay feedback. Clients use one link, tasks land on a Kanban board, and your developers decide what changes and when. MCP access is there if you want your own AI assistant involved, with limits that stop it rewriting task wording, reassigning work or deleting anything.
Compare the two at your real team size. Two people pay $18 on Lite and five pay $40 on Essential, both below Atarim Pro's $67. At ten members, Mega at $78 costs more than Atarim Pro before any credit top-ups.
